Whole genome amplicon sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from lineage B.1.36.27 isolated in Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: The import of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) lineage B.1.36.27 has sparked the fourth wave of COVID-19 outbreak in Hong Kong. This strain has been circulating in Hong Kong since September 2020 but rarely found in other countries (<1%). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 14 SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences collected from patients in Hong Kong between July 2020 and March 2021 were determined by whole viral genome sequencing using Illumina next-generation sequencing platform, followed by phylogenetic analysis. RESULTS: Of the 14 SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences analyzed, 9 strains belonged to the PANGO lineage B.1.36.27, GISAID clade GH, and Nextclade clade 20A. Compared to the reference genome, 31 nucleotide differences and 11 amino acid differences were identified in the genome of the SARS-CoV-2 from PANGO lineage B.1.36.27. CONCLUSIONS: We reported the nucleotides and amino acids mutations identified in the SARS-CoV-2 from PANGO lineage B.1.36.27. Our viral genome sequences enriched the understanding of SARS-CoV-2 mutational landscape and improved the repertoire of known SARS-CoV-2 variants for tracking and tracing. From this study, we found no evidence to show that SARS-CoV-2 from lineage B.1.36.27 can compromise existing vaccines and antibody therapies.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Re-infection by a Phylogenetically Distinct Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Strain Confirmed by Whole Genome Sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Waning immunity occurs in patients who have recovered from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, it remains unclear whether true re-infection occurs. METHODS: Whole genome sequencing was performed directly on respiratory specimens collected during 2 episodes of COVID-19 in a patient. Comparative genome analysis was conducted to differentiate re-infection from persistent viral shedding. Laboratory results, including RT-PCR Ct values and serum Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG, were analyzed. RESULTS: The second episode of asymptomatic infection occurred 142 days after the first symptomatic episode in an apparently immunocompetent patient. During the second episode, there was evidence of acute infection including elevated C-reactive protein and SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroconversion. Viral genomes from first and second episodes belong to different clades/lineages. The virus genome from the first episode contained a a stop codon at position 64 of ORF8, leading to a truncation of 58 amino acids. Another 23 nucleotide and 13 amino acid differences located in 9 different proteins, including positions of B and T cell epitopes, were found between viruses from the first and second episodes. Compared to viral genomes in GISAID, the first virus genome was phylogenetically closely related to strains collected in March/April 2020, while the second virus genome was closely related to strains collected in July/August 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological, clinical, serological, and genomic analyses confirmed that the patient had re-infection instead of persistent viral shedding from first infection. Our results suggest SARS-CoV-2 may continue to circulate among humans despite herd immunity due to natural infection. Further studies of patients with re-infection will shed light on protective immunological correlates for guiding vaccine design.

Serum Antibody Profile of a Patient With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Reinfection.

We recently reported a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 reinfection. Here, we show that serum neutralizing antibodies could be detected during the first episode but not at the presentation of the second episode. During reinfection, neutralizing antibodies and high avidity immunoglobulin G were found within 8 days after hospitalization, whereas immunoglobulin M response was absent.